<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jaclyn Schiff &#187; Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaclynschiff.com/category/blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaclynschiff.com</link>
	<description>Media + content. Sometimes with a global twist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can You Get Someone to do Your Job Search For You?</title>
		<link>http://jaclynschiff.com/blogging/can-you-get-someone-to-do-your-job-search-for-you/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=can-you-get-someone-to-do-your-job-search-for-you</link>
		<comments>http://jaclynschiff.com/blogging/can-you-get-someone-to-do-your-job-search-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaclyn Schiff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaclynschiff.com/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For anyone who has ever gotten frustrated with their job search at any point in their lives (I&#8217;m looking at all of you), I highly recommend this Wall Street Journal piece about companies that conduct aspects of the job search &#8230; <a href="http://jaclynschiff.com/blogging/can-you-get-someone-to-do-your-job-search-for-you/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone who has ever gotten frustrated with their job search at any point in their lives (I&#8217;m looking at <em>all of you</em>), I highly recommend <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303499204576387511296578664.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">this Wall Street Journal piece</a> about companies that conduct aspects of the job search on behalf of their clients.</p>
<p>Perhaps part of the reason I found this article so fascinating is because of my recent, serious interest in outsourcing (how do people do it, how can I make it work for <em>me</em> sort of thing). Also, looking for a new job always struck me as the sort of thing that has to be DIY. But so does managing email and lots of people outsource that!</p>
<p>So reading about the companies in the article and their successes and snafus was definitely an eye opener, and I wanted to learn more. I mean if you were actually going to outsource your job search, how would you do it? And what could you learn from others who have done it.</p>
<p>So I looked around to see what I could find and wrote about in my first piece for <a href="http://www.lifehack.org/articles/management/how-to-outsource-your-job-search.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LifeHack+%28lifehack.org%29" target="_blank">Stepcase Lifehack</a>. Hope you&#8217;ll check it out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaclynschiff.com/blogging/can-you-get-someone-to-do-your-job-search-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Type of Content Works Well on Tumblr?</title>
		<link>http://jaclynschiff.com/journalism/the-types-of-content-that-play-well-with-tumblr/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-types-of-content-that-play-well-with-tumblr</link>
		<comments>http://jaclynschiff.com/journalism/the-types-of-content-that-play-well-with-tumblr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 22:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaclyn Schiff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaclynschiff.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite its growing popularity in the journalism world and among major consumer brands, it still sort of feels like we&#8217;re finding our way in the Tumblr wilderness. It&#8217;s close to a tipping point, but hasn&#8217;t quite hit one yet. And &#8230; <a href="http://jaclynschiff.com/journalism/the-types-of-content-that-play-well-with-tumblr/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite its growing popularity in the journalism world and among <a href="http://flavorwire.com/122035/brands-on-tumblr-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly" target="_blank">major consumer brands</a>, it still sort of feels like we&#8217;re finding our way in the Tumblr wilderness. It&#8217;s <a href="http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_curated_web" target="_blank">close to a tipping point</a>, but hasn&#8217;t quite hit one yet. And if you don&#8217;t want to set up on Tumblr to track a meme  like <a href="http://garfieldminusgarfield.net/" target="_blank">Garfield Minus Garfield</a> or <a href="http://kimjongillookingatthings.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">Kim Jong-Il Looking at Things</a>, what do you do if you want an audience of more than one?</p>
<p>Follow the golden rule of social media &#8212; tailor content to the platform where it will appear. Tumblr is not WordPress or Blogger. It&#8217;s not Twitter and it&#8217;s not a Facebook status update. Simply put, Tumblr is best used as a platform to share media.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chopan/2474197084/"><img title="i &lt;3 Tumblr" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3246/2474197084_95f27cf41a.jpg" alt="i &lt;3 Tumblr" width="500" height="313" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Flickr/cHopan</p></div>
<p>Here are three tips and examples of what content works on Tumblr:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Video clips that make you want to hit replay</strong></li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Sometimes I&#8217;ll scroll through my RSS reader and see a new post from a favorite blog that hasn&#8217;t been updated in a while. But there&#8217;s almost nothing more disappointing in RSS land than discovering that the new post is a video the blogger came across and simply had to share (read: not original). Yeah, maybe I find the video funny  or interesting, but on a blog I expect to hear the blogger&#8217;s voice. On Tumblr, I expect to find videos that I feel compelled to share with others.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Images that scream, &#8220;Have you seen this?&#8221;</strong></li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Tumblr is a flexible and visually-oriented platform. It really lends itself to stories that are told through images rather than words (think <a href="http://shortformblog.tumblr.com/post/3947760091/u-s-fault-lines-nuclear-graphic" target="_blank">infographics</a>, photo journalism etc.). I learned this first-hand when I stumbled upon a picture of <a href="http://jwschiff.tumblr.com/post/4082411083/look-at-those-trees-seil-collins-of-the-new" target="_blank">trees wrapped in spiderwebs in Pakistan</a>. I&#8217;d never seen anything like it and found it fascinating that it was actually helping with malaria control in the area (my Tumblr deals with global health and foreign news mostly). I posted it and so far, 50 people couldn&#8217;t believe their eyes either.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">There are also several categories on <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/explore" target="_blank">Tumblr&#8217;s Explore page</a> that are focused on images: GIF, Tattoos, Illustration and Art.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Under-covered stories</strong></li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Tumblr is becoming <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/technology/02tumblr.html?dbk" target="_blank">increasingly popular</a> in the journalism world. There&#8217;s a lot of smart curation happening, especially with stories that don&#8217;t traditionally get massive attention from mainstream sources.In an <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/9-questions-for-tumblr-newsie-ernie-smith-of-shortformblog/2/" target="_blank">interview I did for Mediaite</a>, Ernie Smith of Short Form Blog talked about how the community helped shed light on the story of <a href="http://shortformblog.tumblr.com/post/4059114573/gulf-oil-spill-jennifer-rexford" target="_blank">Jennifer Ruxford</a>, who experienced health issues because of the Gulf oil spill.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;I think that’s where sites like Tumblr can get a real advantage on  news stories. We can find opportunities like this to tell others about  things that are getting underplayed in the press, and by telling people  about them, can make people in our circle care, Smith said.</p>
<p>As for things that certainly don&#8217;t work, there really aren&#8217;t hard-and-fast rules. For the most part, I&#8217;d caution against text-heavy posts, but there are exceptions, such as this <a href="http://alexleo.tumblr.com/post/5244455384/newyorktimesheadlines" target="_blank">humorous piece about New York Times headlines</a> (310 notes and counting) and some posts that appear under the popular <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/long-reads" target="_blank">long reads tag</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaclynschiff.com/journalism/the-types-of-content-that-play-well-with-tumblr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Follow Breaking Tweets?</title>
		<link>http://jaclynschiff.com/featured/do-you-follow-breaking-tweets/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=do-you-follow-breaking-tweets</link>
		<comments>http://jaclynschiff.com/featured/do-you-follow-breaking-tweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaclyn Schiff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generational issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporting methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BreakingTweets.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaclynschiff.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the idea of BreakingTweets.com. This is exactly what journalists should be doing with Twitter. Don't let the name fool you though, Breaking Tweets is not intended to "break the news." But the site actually did scoop the BBC and CNN last week. Please read further to learn more about this fascinating project. <a href="http://jaclynschiff.com/featured/do-you-follow-breaking-tweets/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea of <a href="http://www.breakingtweets.com" target="_blank">BreakingTweets.com</a>. This is exactly what journalists <a href="http://www.jaclynschiff.com/featured/twitter-contains-news-but-its-not-a-news-source/" target="_blank">should be doing</a> with Twitter. Here&#8217;s some information from the site&#8217;s About page:</p>
<blockquote><p>The site has two main goals: 1. to help people enhance their worldview or perspective of global events; 2. to increase dialogue about international news and make the world smaller through conversation and interaction, both on this site and on Twitter.</p>
<p>The philosophy behind the site is &#8220;hyperlocal gone global.&#8221; There is an emphasis on what is happening in a specific place at a specific time and looks at how people are reacting to that event(s) in the area.</p>
<p><span id="more-191"></span></p></blockquote>
<p>Barbara Iverson recently <a href="http://poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=162515" target="_blank">wrote</a> about the site&#8211;which launched at the beginning of this year&#8211;for Poynter&#8217;s <a href="http://poynter.org/column.asp?id=31" target="_blank">E-Media Tidbits</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[Breaking Tweets] is associated with the account Twitter.com/<a href="http://twitter.com/breakingtweets" target="_blank">breakingtweets</a>, but it takes Twitter messages to a new level. The site has just added Breaking Tweets Entertainment and Breaking Tweets Sports, and will soon add Breaking Tweets Chicago&#8230;</p>
<p>Breaking Tweets has human editors who manually select messages for inclusion in their stories. Furthermore, the editors treat the Tweets like quotes, weaving the 140 character missives into a comprehensive story on a news topic.<span>From a</span><span> &#8220;virtual newsroom,&#8221; the team keeps connected via e-mail and online. </span></p></blockquote>
<p>Last month, BeatBlogging.org&#8217;s <a href="http://nmpaper.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Lily Q</a> interviewed BreakingTweets.com founder <a href="http://www.craigkanalley.com/index.html" target="_blank">Craig Kanalley</a>, a journalism grad student at DePaul University (the staff listed on the Breaking Tweet&#8217;s site mostly consists of journalism students).</p>
<p>Kanalley tells Lily that he first got the idea for the site after he <strong>&#8220;saw the amount of people twittering about Election Day and how Twitter can serve as a place for breaking news, very personal feelings and eyewitness accounts.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>A few more snippets from Kanalley:</p>
<blockquote><p>Tweets are great because they are short, quick and, in many ways, they are just like quotes that journalists would often use anyway. They are instantaneous and, as a result, they work well with news in general, also across a wide geographic scope.</p>
<p>Breaking Tweets changes the practice because it focuses on editing the Web. There is so much clutter out there but it takes it all and seeks to make sense of it. I think a well done Breaking Tweets story can be just as valuable as a longer form traditional news story on the same subject. It gives a different glimpse into the story.</p></blockquote>
<p>See the full interview <a href="http://beatblogging.org/2009/04/01/breaking-tweets-organizes-endless-twitter-stream-around-major-world-news/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let the name fool you though, Breaking Tweets is not intended to &#8220;break the news.&#8221; In a <a href="http://blog.craigkanalley.com/2009/05/breaking-tweets-beating-big-networks.html" target="_blank">blog post</a>, Kanalley writes, &#8220;The point of the site I put together is to chronicle the biggest news around the world each day and put a Twitter spin on it by personalizing the news through tweets.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the site actually did scoop the BBC and CNN last week.  Read more about that <a href="http://blog.craigkanalley.com/2009/05/breaking-tweets-beating-big-networks.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_195" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 458px"><a href="http://www.jaclynschiff.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/breakingtweets.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-195" title="breakingtweets" src="http://www.jaclynschiff.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/breakingtweets.png" alt="Breaking Tweets logo/BreakingTweets.com" width="448" height="122" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Breaking Tweets logo/BreakingTweets.com</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaclynschiff.com/featured/do-you-follow-breaking-tweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interviews: Video is King</title>
		<link>http://jaclynschiff.com/featured/interviews-video-is-king/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=interviews-video-is-king</link>
		<comments>http://jaclynschiff.com/featured/interviews-video-is-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaclyn Schiff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generation Y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaclynschiff.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each time I watch one of Jun Loayza's interviews I think about how this probably wouldn't work as well in text. The same is basically true for almost any blogger who wants to feature an interview in a blog post. Video works better than print. Here are some reasons why.  <a href="http://jaclynschiff.com/featured/interviews-video-is-king/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that this post is coming from me. The truth is, I rarely watch online video clips, definitely fewer than the <a id="l043" title="average person" href="http://www.contentagenda.com/blog/1680000368/post/580042658.html">average person</a>. On most days, I probably don&#8217;t watch anything online. But lately, I have been making time to check out the interviews on <a href="http://www.junloayza.com/" target="_blank">Jun Loayza</a>&#8216;s Viralogy <a href="http://awesome.viralogy.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>.</p>
<p>From the day Jun launched this blog, I was hooked. Posts often feature Jun interviewing another blogger about his or her blog, the blog content, personal aspirations and other topics. Jun&#8217;s concept works so well because he&#8217;s helping readers and bloggers connect beyond the text. This interests almost all blog readers, which is why the &#8220;About&#8221; page is often one of the <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/23/random-blog-tip-include-an-about-page/" target="_blank">most viewed</a> pages on a blog.</p>
<p>Each time I watch one of Jun&#8217;s interviews I think about how this probably wouldn&#8217;t work as well in text. The same is basically true for almost any blogger who wants to feature an interview in a blog post. <strong>Video works better than print. </strong>Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Conventional Q&amp;A&#8217;s Aren&#8217;t Compelling</strong></span><br />
Bloggers love posting Q&amp;A&#8217;s because it&#8217;s easy to create this content. You shoot off a bunch of questions to an interview subject and he or she e-mails you back. Copy, paste, publish and you&#8217;re done. The person you&#8217;ve selected to interview might be somewhat interesting and have some insightful things to say, but you&#8217;ll probably won&#8217;t elicit brilliant must-read answers by using this method.<br />
<span style="color: #008000;"><strong><br />
Interviews Usually Don&#8217;t Provide New Information </strong></span><br />
Social media makes everyone more <a href="http://thelostjacket.com/customer-service/contact-information-upper-management-hide-anymore" target="_blank">accessible</a>, so if I had a burning question for the person you&#8217;re interviewing, I could send them a message, tweet, e-mail or IM. I&#8217;m probably less likely to schedule a video chat with someone I hardly know. But there&#8217;s a lot of non-verbal communication that goes on when you see a person on a video and that information helps you develop an impression of what the person is actually like.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #008000;">Interviews are Valuable as Part of a Larger Undertaking</span></strong><br />
Text interviews are much more compelling to read with analysis, context and responses. Perhaps your interview subject gave you an interesting answer, you&#8217;re much more likely to write memorable content if you provide even more than just that interesting answer. Did someone contradict that answer? Why is it interesting or unusual? Interviews in the context of an article are more interesting than if they stand alone.</p>
<p>Sure, other factors are involved in making the content compelling. Jun basically started the blog with a pre-existing community because most (if not all) of the featured bloggers are from the Gen. Y / <a href="http://www.brazencareerist.com" target="_blank">BrazenCareerist.com</a> community, so there&#8217;s a pre-existing curiosity about learning more about people whose names you recognize. Chuck Westbrook&#8217;s experience also highlights the importance of community. Chuck recently <a id="s-0z" title="refocused" href="http://bloghiker.com/">refocused</a> his blog project and openly <a id="b:-x" title="blogged" href="http://chuckwestbrook.com/mission-failure-and-changes-coming-monday/">blogged</a> about what was working and what wasn&#8217;t, commenters pointed out that the bloggers Chuck profiled didn&#8217;t have a lot in common&#8211;the community ties were weak.</p>
<p>Of course, it also goes without saying that some people come across a lot better in print that on video. But for those who can pull it off, video wins hands down when it comes to interviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaclynschiff.com/featured/interviews-video-is-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

